SB 293 takes effect January 1, 2012. It:
1. Decreases,
from 10 to 7, the number of days by which a prime contractor or
subcontractor must pay a subcontractor after receiving a progress
payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing.
2. Requires
a subcontractor to give written notice to the surety and bond principal
that he or she is enforcing a claim prior to completion or recordation
of the Notice of Completion of a project, except as specified, if the
20-day public works preliminary notice was required by any person that
has no direct contractual relationship with the contractor and who has
not given notice as provided in Civil Code Section 3098, that person may
enforce a claim by giving written notice to the surety and bond
principal within 15 days after recordation of a notice of completion. If
no notice of completion has been recorded, the time for giving written
notice to the surety and the bond principal is extended to 75 days after
completion of the work of improvement. This provision would not apply
in the event that all progress payments, other than those disputed in
good faith, have been made to a subcontractor who has a direct
contractual relationship with the general contractor to whom the
claimant
has provided materials or services, or in the case of a subcontractor
who has been terminated from the project pursuant to the contract, all
such progress payments have been made as of the termination date, except
those disputed in good faith.
3. Exempts
a laborer from preliminary notice requirements to a surety and bond
principal and any deadline to enforce a claim after the completion of a
project for private works of improvement.
4. Prohibits
a public entity from retaining more than five percent of a contract
price until final completion and acceptance of a project.
5. Requires
that retention proceeds between an original contractor and a
subcontractor, or between two subcontractors, not exceed five percent of
payment or contract price. Does not apply if the contractor provides
written notice to the subcontractor, prior to or at the time that the
bid is requested, that a bond may be required and the subcontractor
subsequently is unable or refuses to furnish to the contractor a
performance or payment bond issued by an admitted surety insurer.
6.
Prohibits progress payments on public works contracts from being made
in excess of 100 percent of the percentage of actual work completed.
7. Authorizes
a public entity to retain more than five percent of the contract price
in public works projects under the following conditions:
A.
For certain projects awarded by state departments, the project is
substantially complex and the department includes this finding and the
actual retention amount in the bid documents;
B.
For projects awarded by local entities, the governing body of the local
public entity, or its designee, has approved or ratified by a majority
vote during a properly noticed and normally scheduled public hearing
prior to bid that the project is substantially complex, and includes
this finding and the actual retention amount in the bid documents;
and,
C. Retention proceeds between an original contractor and a subcontractor,
or between two subcontractors, shall not exceed the specified retention
percentage in the contract between the public entity and the original
contractor.
1. Sunsets these retention provisions on January 1, 2016.
SB 474 takes effect on January 1, 2013
SB 474's staff synopsis as enrolled and sent to the Governor:
1.
Prohibits construction contracts requiring indemnity, insurance, or
defense obligations by a subcontractor for the active negligence or
willful misconduct of a general contractor, his/her agents, or certain
other subcontractors.
2.
Provides that, unless otherwise prohibited under this bill, the parties
to a construction contract can freely contract for other protections
and obligations of each party, but allows numerous exemptions, including
residential construction contracts, direct contracts with a public
agency or owner, and insurance contracts for project wrap up and
workers' compensation.
3.
Requires an insurer to uphold their contractual obligations to
additional insureds pursuant to Presley Homes, Inc. v. American State
Insurance Company (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 571.
4.
Provides that an insurer maintains reimbursement rights from a general
contractor or other subcontractor pursuant to the holding in Buss v.
Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 35.
5.
Provides a defense or settlement option for commercial construction
contracts similar to existing law regarding residential construction
contracts under which a subcontractor, after receiving claim information
from the general contractor, has the option to defend the claim or pay
its portion of the claim.
6.
Provides that in the event a contractor fails to maintain its
obligations to defend or pay its portion of the claim, the general
contractor may make a claim for compensatory and consequential damages
and reasonable attorney's fees.
7.
Clarifies that a public agency is prohibited from shifting its
liability for its active negligence to a contractor, subcontractor, or
materials supplier.
8.
Establishes that a project owner, not acting as a project manager,
general contractor, or materials supplier, is prohibited from shifting
liability for its active negligence to a contractor, subcontractor, or
materials supplier.
9.
Provides that these new rights and obligations shall be construed to
affect the obligation, if any, of either a contractor or construction
manager to indemnify, including defending or paying the costs to defend,
a public agency against any claim arising from the alleged active
negligence of the public agency under Civil Code Section 2782(b) or to
indemnify, including defending or paying the costs to defend, an owner
of privately owned real property to be improved against any claim
arising from the alleged active negligence of the owner under Civil Code
Section 2782(c).
No comments:
Post a Comment