Sunday, May 5, 2013

Architectural Billings Index


The March 2013 Architectural Billings Index (ABI) numbers came in above the critical 50.0 number for the 8th month in a row on a national basis (also for the West Region) coming in at 51.9.  The West Region reported in at 51.9 while the Northeast, Midwest and South regions reported 54.6, 53.9 and 53.6 respectively.  The strongest sector nationally was Multifamily Residential at 56.9 with Commercial reported at 53.5 followed by Mixed Practice (53.3) and Institutional (50.6).

The West region reported 46.6 in 2012 and 47.7 in 2011, so the 51.9 is a nice improvement and as the number is greater than 50.0, indicates architect’s billings are increasing.  As I reported a few years ago, the ABI is a leading indicator of construction activity as construction spending generally lags architect’s billings by 9 months to a year.  In recent months, we have seen many contractor’s backlogs increase with improving margins.  However, we also still see challenging situations as well.  That being said it seems like many contractors are finding more opportunities and are posting good results.  Those who continue prudent operational/fiscal management, are selective with which jobs to bid and running with lower overhead are poised to take advantage of the improving landscape.

Sunday, April 7, 2013

CFMA's Compensation Trends in the Construction Industry (along with PAS, Inc.)


The Construction Financial Management Association (CFMA) publishes a magazine bi-monthly entitled “Building Profits”.  In the January/February 2013 issue, it contained an article addressing compensation trends in the industry.  The analysis includes breakdowns by position providing further breakdowns by region, company size, sector, etc. and is insightful.

The highlights of the survey include suggesting that higher compensation levels can be found in the East and the South and Business Development personnel can command higher salaries than the CFO. 

PAS, Inc. is, in my opinion and experience, the leading firm providing compensation data for the construction industry.  They are the engine behind this analysis.  The complete survey, definitely worth a read, can be found here...

Sunday, March 10, 2013

FMI's 2013 US Markets Construction Overview

Recently I attended a presentation by FMI Management Consulting.  I've known FMI for many years and have come to respect them as a leading firm in the construction industry.  The slideshow in the following link contains over 50 slides of data ranging from forecasts in different sectors of the construction industry to surety statistics to demographics/population data (including maps), profitability information and economic data, etc.  I hope you find the information useful...  

Proposed Revenue Recognition Changes Update


You may have heard over the last year or so about the proposed changes for how contractors will recognize revenue.  For those of us who have been in the in the industry for a while, we are most familiar with Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1 (Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, 1981) which was replaced by Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605-35.  These pronouncements dictate the current standards for revenue recognition, Percentage of Completion based primarily on costs.

The world is changing, in many ways getting "smaller".  Convergence is a word we hear tossed around regularly in terms of reporting standards internationally.  I've been following these drafts as they are called, published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for some time now.  They seem to be getting closer to pulling the trigger on what will change after much back and forth between industry participants and the FASB.  I'm personally a fan of how we report now, I'm not sure what is "broken" so to speak.  Again, I think it has more to do with consistency across industries and nations rather than how we here in the US Construction Industry feel about the current model for revenue recognition.

The CFMA has done a nice job of summarizing the current state of affairs.  We won't be dealing with any changes for a few years as they've set 2018 as the first year private companies will need to comply.  Here's the CFMA Synopsis...

Sunday, February 3, 2013

American Taxpayer Relief Act 2012

There has been much going on in Washington in recent weeks surrounding our tax laws and fiscal policies.  Thankfully the adults in Congress reached a compromise last month and the President signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.

I'm not sure "relief" is an appropriate word to be used in the title here, however we did gain some certainty, at least with respect to tax rates.  I'm also not sure the American worker who heard so much in the media about protection of the middle class felt relief when s/he opened up that first paycheck in 2013 and was puzzled why the net check went down only to learn payroll taxes went back to the normal, pre-holiday, rates.

US Bank did a nice job in summarizing, in a short two page document seen below, what they are calling the "tax highlights" of the new law.

Tax Depreciation Limits

I thought it might be nice to publish a summary of the 2012 tax depreciation limits for accounting and finance personnel to be able to reference.  If these limits don't particularly excite you, please forward to those tasked with knowing such things.

Below are the 2012 tax depreciation limits for Section 179 and bonus depreciation, since this changes year to year.  The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 extended the Section 179 amounts for the 2012 and 2013 tax year.  The 50% bonus depreciation was also extended to the 2013 calendar year.

FEDERAL TAX
1.       Section 179 for 2012 tax year (see below) - Maximum Sec. 179 deduction $500,000.  Investment limit $2,000,000.  (If more than $2M of fixed assets additions of qualifying Sec. 179 assets, the Sec. 179 deduction phases out dollar-for-dollar, e.g., if there is $2,000,001 in additions, the Sec. 179 is reduced to $499,999 – Sec. 179 is completely phased out when total additions exceed $2.5M).  Most common non-qualifying Sec. 179 assets are Leasehold Improvements (with exceptions).

2.       50% Additional First Year Bonus Depreciation – Asset must be new.  The bonus depreciation was 100% for the 2011 calendar year.  (For example, if you have a 6/30/12 FYE client, 100% bonus depreciation will apply for 7/1/11 – 12/31/11, and 50% bonus depreciation will apply for 1/1/12 – 6/30/12).

CALIFORNIA – California never conforms to federal.
1.       Section 179 – Maximum Sec. 179 deduction $25,000.  Investment limit $200,000.  (Same dollar-for-dollar phase out applies – at $225k new additions, Sec. 179 is completely phased out).

2.       No bonus depreciation allowed.

TAX YEARS
The basic rule for tax years – it is determined by when the fiscal year starts.

The 2012 tax year for Section 179 is applicable for 12/31/12, 1/31/13, 2/28/13, 3/31/13, 4/30/13, 5/31/13, 6/30/13, 7/31/13, 8/31/13, 9/30/13, 10/31/13, and 11/30/13 clients.

COMMON ASSET LIVES (BNA)
1.       3 year SL – off-the-shelf software
2.       5 year MC200 – cars & trucks (see note below for limitations), computers, machinery and equipment
3.       7 year MC200 – furniture, phones
4.       15 year MC150 – land improvements (parking lot, fencing, sidewalks)
5.       27.5 year SL – Residential Real Property
6.       39 year SL – Commercial Real Property (including leasehold improvements that are structural and affixed) – certain LHI can utilize a shorter 15-year life for federal if certain criteria are met – please ask if this applies to your client.

NOTE ON CARS & TRUCKS (SEE ATTACHMENT)
1.       Most cars and trucks are limited to the amount of depreciation (including Sec. 179 and bonus depreciation) you can take each year.  The code for listed property in BNA is “AL.”  For 2012, autos are limited to $3,160 depreciation in the first year.  If bonus depreciation is taken (auto needs to be new), the first year depreciation limit is increased to $11,160.

2.       For trucks having gross vehicle weight rating >6,000 lbs. and bed length >6 feet – can take Sec. 179 for entire cost – refer to Table I in the attached file

3.       For (a) SUVs >6,000 lbs., (b) vans >6,000 lbs., and (c) trucks >6,000 lbs. with bed length < 6 feet – Sec. 179 is limited to $25,000 – refer to Table II - IV in attached file

SECTION 179 LIMIT & MID-QUARTER RULES
If Sec. 179 is being limited, and you are trying to figure out which assets to apply the Sec. 179 and which assets to not, the basic steps to take are:

1.       First, choose all the assets with the longer class life (e.g., choose the 7-year asset vs. 5-year).

2.       Second, choose the asset closer to year end (e.g., choose the asset purchased on 12/31 vs. the asset purchased on 1/1).

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. Notice: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message. Please also destroy any hard copies and delete this message from your computer. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of our firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Chapman 2013 Economic Forecast



Each year since 1978 Chapman University has published an economic forecast.  These reports are widely anticipated and regarded as one of the better forecasts known for their detail and, most times, accuracy.

At the bullet points below, I've provided some of the highlights per my review of the report.  For those wishing to read the full report, and I encourage you to do so, you can find a copy here.  The full report has many charts, graphs and tables which are quite useful.

  • The recovery is in its 3rd year and Chapman forecasts the recovery to continue into a 4th year in 2013 with an estimated increase in GDP of 2.1%, roughly similar to 2012.
  • Housing continues to be a bright spot.  Nationally, housing inventory is low and housing starts have increased significantly.  Housing starts increased 25% in 2012 and are forecast to increase again at a 13% clip in 2013.  Nationally, prices increased 6% in 2012 and are forecast to increase 3.5% in 2013.  In Orange County, Chapman forecasts price appreciation of 4.2% in 2012 and 6.8% in 2013.
  •  Household Net Worth is forecast to return to its pre-recession high by the end of 2013 which explains the boost in consumer confidence seen in recent months.
  •  “California and Orange County economies will be facing headwinds in the coming year that may derail the recent pickup in job creation.  Higher taxes – sales, income and payroll – are the primary concern.” 
  •  “On the bright side, the Anderson Center’s California Consumer Sentiment Index increased to 94.2 in the third quarter of 2012, a level not seen since the third quarter of 2007.” 
  •  “Another positive development is the rebound in construction spending…construction spending…is projected to grow by 10.0 percent in Orange County in 2013.” 
  •  “Overall, our forecast calls for an increase of 1.8 percent in total payroll employment in Orange County in 2013…Job growth in construction, professional & business services and leisure & hospitality will outperform all the other sectors of the economy in Orange County and California.” 
  •  “The combination of job and real income growth along with historically low mortgage rates bode well for the housing market.” 
  •  “In fact, Orange County’s notices of default is currently the lowest in Southern California and showed the sharpest decline in the third quarter of 2012 and is also at its lowest level since the housing slump.”